Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-10-16 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-10-16 Senate Journal Page 4383 SB 250 Message of June 6 was received, stating: Dear President Pearce: Under the authority of art. II, sec. 15 of the Alaska Constitution, I have vetoed the following bill: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 250(FIN) am H An Act relating to the University of Alaska and to assets of the University of Alaska; authorizing the University of Alaska to select additional state public domain land, designating that land as `university trust land,' and describing the principles applicable to the land's management and the development of its resources; and defining the net income from the University of Alaska's endowment trust fund as `university receipts' subject to prior legislative appropriation. The bill provides for the selection and transfer of 350,000 acres of state land to the University of Alaska. Since Statehood, the University has sought to obtain more land to raise revenue to support the University system. During Governor Egans administration a similar bill was passed by the legislature and subsequently vetoed by Governor Egan. He believed that the act would substantially complicate management of state lands and would be both inefficient and confusing to the public. In 1994 the legislature again passed a bill, SB 16, that was similar in nature to the bill Governor Egan vetoed. I vetoed Senate Bill 16 and am vetoing SB 250 for many of the same reasons that prompted Governor Egan early in statehood. Although the legislature attempted during the 1996 legislative session to address the problems my administration identified regarding SB 250, there remain several technical and philosophical concerns which have led me to veto this most recent land transfer bill. The most compelling of those concerns are: 1996-10-16 Senate Journal Page 4384 SB 250 the bill fails to prohibit the conveyance of oil and gas lands to the University. It would be imprudent to transfer those lands that contribute to the well-being of all Alaskans to a discrete entity thereby reducing the general funds available to support basic state services; the bill would constrain future municipalities in their land selections; the land base of Alaska will be further segmented by splitting management with another public entity causing conflicts between land owners and users; the uncertainty of the process for evaluating future development proposals under this legislation has led several groups including mining interests, Native organizations, local governments and sport fishing and environmental groups to have serious concerns with this bill; the public process regarding land use and resolution of land disputes is uncertain; and, the University would not be subject to the states area-wide plans and land classifications in its use of lands, nor would it be subject to local land-use plans such as district coastal management plans in the use and disposal of lands. These plans were developed based on extensive resource analysis and public input and they ensure that state lands will be managed in the public interest. These are among the many concerns that have compelled me to veto this legislation. I do not believe state land transfers to the University is in the best interest of the citizens of the State of Alaska. Sincerely, /s/ Tony Knowles Governor